As democratic India prepares to celebrate the 125th year of his birth, Dr B. R. Ambedkar stands taller than he ever did before. This is essentially because the deep-seated problems spotlighted by his life and work remain very much alive while the bold and often profound questions he raised about Indian society remain unanswered.
It is not without political significance that the Hindu Right is currently attempting, against the grain of history, to appropriate Dr Ambedkar’s legacy. In this situation, his uncompromising analysis of the caste system, of chaturvarnya and sanatana dharma, of notions of pollution, of unalterable or rigid social hierarchy, and of the implications of the hegemony of the shastras must be read, re-read, and made part of a national debate.
Dr Ambedkar’s outstanding intellectual contribution to re-imagining and building a new India free from the debilitating, indeed soul-destroying, system of caste as an institution of social oppression and discrimination incompatible with democracy must be ranked on a par with his justly celebrated contribution to the making of India’s Republican Constitution.
— from N Ram, Convocation speech, Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), May 12, 2015 (pdf file attached)
Water breaks all the rules. Since the 19th century, chemists have developed a robust framework to describe what liquids are and what they can do. Those ideas are almost useless at explaining the weird behaviour of water.
Victor Trumper (November 2, 1877-June 28, 1915) is one of the most romantic figures in the history of cricket. In his Jack Marsh History Lecture 2015 in Sydney, Gideon Haigh, writer and cricket historian, brings alive the wonder that was Trumper, offering in the process rare insights into the nuances of sports photography. (“When he came he opened the windows of the mind to a new vision of what batting could be…In composition and content, it is a very great photograph. It is both the first and last word in batting, insofar as batting consists of making instinctive what begins as a set of quite unnatural motions.”) Listen here to the lecture, in three parts, on YouTube; read the text, attached as a pdf file. George Beldam’s iconic picture of Trumper leaping out to drive is also attached:
Other resources on Trumper:
Cricinfo (statistical summary): http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia/content/player/7980.html
Official site: http://www.victortrumper.com/index.htm
Trumper & Don Bradman: http://www.cricketcountry.com/articles/victor-trumper-the-batsman-often-rated-above-don-bradman-19278
Select bibliography: http://www.victortrumper.com/biblio.htm
Australian sport’s most memorable photographs: http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2014/mar/12/the-joy-of-six-australian-sports-most-memorable-photographs
Fight the ban by the Government of the film “India’s Daughter,” and expose the slander against film-maker Leslee Udwin (a curious case of convergence between Hindutva and people who should know better).
Read N. Ram’s comprehensive analysis of the case today, Parvathi Menon’s interview with Leslee Udwin, and Jason Burke’s exceptional 2013 article on the issue:
Playing In The Temperate Zone | N. Ram.
“The schedule, format, and playing conditions of the ICC Cricket World Cup 2015 have been justly criticised: too long, too many gaps between matches for some leading teams, too loaded in favour of batsmen and teams winning the toss, batting first, and making 300-plus; and too geared to maximising TV ratings and revenues to the detriment of sporting value.”
“But why should teams be allowed to absorb losses and still progress? Why should the leading Test teams be given so many chances to make up for poor cricket or after losing to lower-ranked or less fancied opponents who played better on the day? It is time cricket lovers round the world issued a showcause notice to the ICC, and to the Big Three—the Board of Control for Cricket in India, the England and Wales Cricket Board, and Cricket Australia—who control the fortunes of the game.”
Tariq Ali, writing in the London Review of Books, looks incisively into key issues that arise from the atrocity, the horrendous murder of 12 people at the headquarters of the French satirical magazine. A Guardian editorial and the New York Times Editor and Public Editor explain why the two newspapers with a global reach decided not to re-publish the Charlie Hebdo cartoons targeting the Prophet. The New York Times fields a debate on whether satirists can sometimes be ‘too provocative and outrageous’ and whether they ‘should hold themselves back’.
‘Short Cuts’ by Tariq Ali:
Guardian editorial view: ‘show solidarity but in your own voice':
New York Times Editor Dean Baquet in fiery, touch-me-not Facebook attack on critic of newspaper’s decision not to reproduce Charlie Hebdo cartoons:
New York Times Public Editor Margaret Sullivan on how the decision not to re-publish the Charlie Hebdo cartoons was made:
‘When Satire Cuts Both Ways':
‘Victims of the Terror Attacks in Paris':
Why String Theory Still Offers Hope We Can Unify Physics | Science | Smithsonian.
“Experimental evidence is the final arbiter of right and wrong, but a theory’s value is also assessed by the depth of influence it has on allied fields. By this measure, string theory is off the charts. Decades of analysis filling thousands of articles have had a dramatic impact on a broad swath of research cutting across physics and mathematics.”
Hilary Mantel, one of the world’s finest novelists, talks to Tom Sutcliffe on BBC Radio 4 about her wonderful new collection of short stories, “The Assassination of Margaret Thatcher and Other Stories” (Kindle edition: Fourth Estate, 2014). Asked how she came to write the title story, she provides fascinating insights into a writer’s mind and the writing process. The title story can be read at the second link below:
BBC Radio 4 interview (audio):
“The Assassination of Margaret Thatcher,” title story (a Guardian exclusive):
Author’s reply to critics:
Damian Barr defends Mantel:
“Three days before the end…Beethoven had said, “*Plaudite*,* amici*,* comoedia finita est*” (“Applaud, friends, the comedy is over”)….Perhaps Beethoven was mocking his doctors; perhaps he was mocking the priest who administered the last rites; perhaps he was mocking himself. In any event, he was laughing about something as the curtain came down. He presumably did not know that, like the Emperor Augustus, he was about to undergo deification.”
Peter Piot was a researcher at a lab in Antwerp when a pilot brought him a blood sample from a Belgian nun who had fallen mysteriously ill in Zaire. http://gu.com/p/4268p
When Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed his fans in a campaign-style appearance at New York’s Madison Square Garden, “he wasn’t just speaking to the people on this continent. In fact, the symbolism and rhetoric of this trip were carefully calibrated toward his Hindu nationalist base at home (and here, too)…The message: I may nod to tolerance and openness, but I’m really still with you.” A perceptive analysis by Meera Nair, who teaches writing at New York University:
‘As emerging markets, each with its own strengths, we need to become closer development partners who draw upon each other’s strengths and work together for common development. With rich experience in infrastructure building and manufacturing, China is ready to contribute to India’s development in these areas. India is advanced in IT and pharmaceutical industries, and Indian companies are welcome to seek business opportunities in the Chinese market. The combination of the “world’s factory” and the “world’s back office” will produce the most competitive production base and the most attractive consumer market…I am confident that as long as China and India work together, the Asian century of prosperity and renewal will surely arrive at an early date.’
“The United States and its European allies now face a choice on Ukraine. They can continue their current policy, which will exacerbate hostilities with Russia and devastate Ukraine in the process — a scenario in which everyone would come out a loser. Or they can switch gears and work to create a prosperous but neutral Ukraine, one that does not threaten Russia and allows the West to repair its relations with Moscow. With that approach, all sides would win.”